Bloom’s Argument, In “anxiety Of Influence” Is What?

Unraveling the Enigma of Influence: Decoding Harold Bloom’s Theory

In the labyrinth of literary criticism, few theories have sparked as intriguing and controversial debates as Harold Bloom’s “Anxiety of Influence.” First introduced in his seminal work in 1973, Bloom’s argument dives deep into the psyche of a writer, proposing a radical view on how literary history is a battleground of creative minds wrestling with the influence of their predecessors. But what precisely is this theory, and why does it continue to stir the pot in literary circles? Let’s dissect the essence of Bloom’s argument and explore its implications on our understanding of literary creation and evolution.

The Crux of Bloom’s Theory

At its core, Bloom’s “Anxiety of Influence” is far from being just another dry, academic theory. Instead, it reads like a psychological thriller set in the vast expanse of literary history. Bloom suggests that every poet (though his theory can be extended to other artists) subconsciously battles with the influence of those who came before. It’s not a mere imitation game but an intricate dance of admiration, rivalry, and ultimately, an attempt to surpass one’s literary ancestors.

Bloom identifies six phases – or “revisionary ratios” – that artists pass through in their quest to achieve originality:

1. Clinamen (Swerve): A poet creatively misreads or misinterprets a precursor to pave their path.
2. Tessera (Completion): Staying true to the original vision while taking it further.
3. Kenosis (Emptying): A deliberate breaking away from strong influences.
4. Daemonization (Counter-Sublime): Elevating the concept or idea to a higher, almost divine status.
5. Askesis (Self-Purgation): Minimizing one’s art to differentiate from the influence.
6. Apophrades (Return): Where the cycle comes full circle, and the precursor’s influence is acknowledged, transcending the anxiety.

Why It Matters?

The theory of the “Anxiety of Influence” challenges us to look beyond the surface of literary works and delve into the psychological struggles of creation. It breaks the myth of the “lone genius” and presents art as a continuum, constantly evolving through an invisible dialogue between generations of artists. Here’s why Bloom’s theory still captures our fascination:

• It’s relatable: Every creator, at some point, has grappled with the shadow of their idols. Bloom puts words to an almost universal creative dilemma.
• Shines a light on literary evolution: By understanding these dynamics, we can appreciate the complexities and nuances of how literature evolves over time.
• Encourages a deeper reading: Seeking out the echoes and influences in works offers a richer, more layered experience of literature.

In essence, Harold Bloom’s “Anxiety of Influence” is a testament to the complex, often tumultuous, relationship between creators and their forebears. Like a seasoned detective, Bloom invites us to unravel the mysteries of literary heritage, encouraging us to witness the creative sparks that fly when great minds collide. Whether you’re an aspiring writer, a literary critic, or just someone intrigued by the creative process, diving into this theory opens up a new perspective on the art of making art. As we navigate through the echoes of the past, we might just find our own voice, distinct and resonant, in the chorus of history.